Federal Courts Face Surge of Litigation Over Public Records Access
A wave of lawsuits challenges the Trump administration’s restrictive new policies on the Freedom of Information Act and the Presidential Records Act.
A wave of lawsuits challenges the Trump administration’s restrictive new policies on the Freedom of Information Act and the Presidential Records Act.
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais establishes a rigorous new standard for redistricting challenges, requiring plaintiffs to provide objective proof of discriminatory intent.
In 1836, the United States House of Representatives adopted the "Gag Rule" to automatically table all anti-slavery petitions without discussion. This procedural maneuver, championed by Southern legislators, sparked a decade-long…
In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court invalidated Louisiana’s second majority-Black district, signaling a stricter interpretation of the Voting Rights Act and the constitutional necessity of race-neutral redistricting principles.
A 6-3 conservative majority ruled Louisiana’s majority-Black 6th District an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, establishing a rigorous new evidentiary standard for future redistricting challenges.
Elon Musk’s high-stakes litigation against OpenAI enters its second day in federal court, focusing on whether the AI pioneer breached its original nonprofit mission through its partnership with Microsoft.
The Supreme Court begins a pivotal week addressing whether federal pesticide laws shield Bayer from liability and if police geofencing warrants violate the Fourth Amendment.
ICC judges unanimously confirmed crimes against humanity charges against Rodrigo Duterte, setting a significant precedent for international jurisdiction over former heads of state.
Recent judicial actions across the globe underscore a return to originalist principles, from the enforcement of tariff refunds to the rejection of unprogrammed spending frameworks.