Trump Administration Shifts Asylum Cases to Courts Amid Enforcement Surge
A new federal rule bypasses initial asylum interviews, sending hundreds of thousands of cases directly to immigration courts to expedite potential removal orders.
A new federal rule bypasses initial asylum interviews, sending hundreds of thousands of cases directly to immigration courts to expedite potential removal orders.
A landmark French judicial ruling requiring major corporations to reduce carbon emissions is poised to reshape liability standards across Belgium, Italy, and Switzerland.
Regulators allege the telehealth giant shared sensitive medical data with Meta and Snap while trapping consumers in deceptive subscription loops.
In 1935, the United States Supreme Court decided the Gold Clause Cases, a series of rulings that determined whether the federal government could legally invalidate contracts requiring payment in gold.…
The Supreme Court set an August 3 deadline for states to respond to the Trump administration’s emergency request to implement federal screening of mail-in ballots ahead of the 2026 midterms.
Johnson & Johnson proposes a $5.5 billion settlement to resolve nearly all pending ovarian cancer claims, pivoting from bankruptcy maneuvers to a direct negotiated resolution.
Press reports celebrate France’s social media ban for minors while overlooking significant enforcement gaps, legal hurdles, and transparency failures in international sports governance.
The Senate moves toward confirming Jay Clayton as DNI while federal courts block the administration’s attempt to centralize voter rolls, highlighting a broader struggle over the limits of administrative authority.
A high-stakes legal battle in Arizona over the universal Empowerment Scholarship Account program highlights the friction between union-backed ballot initiatives and constitutional school choice protections.