Colorado Gun Dealers Sue Over Warrantless Records Inspection Law

Avatar photo

ByBen Taylor

June 18, 2026

A federal lawsuit challenges a new Colorado law requiring firearms dealers to grant law enforcement unrestricted, warrantless access to private sales records at all times.

A coalition of firearms dealers and advocacy groups has moved to block a newly enacted Colorado law that grants law enforcement agencies unrestricted, warrantless access to retail sales records. The legal challenge, filed in federal court, centers on House Bill 26-1126, a measure signed by Governor Jared Polis on June 2, 2026, which fundamentally alters the regulatory landscape for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) within the state.

Under the provisions of HB 26-1126, the state has moved beyond its historical focus on handguns to encompass every retail firearm sale. The statute mandates that dealers obtain a separate state firearms dealer permit in addition to their federal credentials. Central to the controversy is a requirement that dealers maintain a comprehensive log of every transfer, including the buyer’s name, age, and physical address. The law explicitly states that these records must be made available at all times for inspection by any duly authorized peace officer. Refusal to provide these documents upon demand is now punishable as a class 2 misdemeanor.

The plaintiffs in the suit include the Centennial Gun Club, five individual federally licensed dealers, and the Colorado State Shooting Association. This filing marks the third recent constitutional challenge brought by the Shooting Association against the state’s tightening firearms regulations. The complaint names Governor Polis, Attorney General Phil Weiser, and Department of Revenue Executive Director Heidi Humphreys as defendants, seeking a federal injunction to prevent the state from enforcing the inspection regime.

The legal argument rests on the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The plaintiffs contend that by requiring businesses to open their private records to law enforcement without a warrant, probable cause, or any defined administrative limits, the state is bypassing core constitutional safeguards. The filing describes the “at all times” access as an overreach that treats small business owners as suspects rather than regulated entities. Furthermore, the suit alleges that the law chills the exercise of Second Amendment rights by enabling what it describes as de-facto surveillance or a shadow registry of every lawful gun owner in Colorado.

While Colorado has long maintained a statute allowing for the inspection of handgun sales records, HB 26-1126 significantly ups the stakes. The new law introduces a heavy-handed enforcement mechanism, granting the state authority to levy fines of up to $100,000 for repeated violations of the permitting and record-keeping rules. This shift toward a state-managed permitting system represents a significant expansion of the administrative state’s role in monitoring private commerce.

This legislative push follows other recent efforts to integrate law enforcement more deeply into the retail process. For instance, the state recently adopted Senate Bill 25-205, which created a formal process for FFLs to ask local sheriffs to run serial-number checks on firearms from private sellers. While that bill provided a 72-hour window for sheriffs to respond and required dealers to report suspected stolen property, HB 26-1126 removes the buffer of a specific request, instead demanding constant, open-ended access to the dealer’s entire transaction history.

As the case moves toward a hearing, the court will have to weigh the state’s interest in public safety and crime investigation against the privacy rights of business owners and the constitutional protections afforded to their customers. For the plaintiffs, the issue is a matter of clear-cut bureaucratic overreach. They argue that if the government wishes to inspect private records, it must follow the established legal process of obtaining a warrant, rather than demanding a standing invitation to browse the books of law-abiding citizens.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *