Stephen Federico urged Attorney General Todd Blanche and Sen. Darline Graham to advance Logan’s Law, a bill named for his daughter, who was killed during a break-in in 2025. The proposal would direct the attorney general to create a public federal database of people convicted of violent crimes and encourage information-sharing among states. Supporters say the system could help address gaps between jurisdictions, after Federico said local police did not know about outstanding warrants in the accused person’s record. Blanche and Graham said they want bipartisan passage, but the bill has not gained momentum since its introduction in April. It still needs approval from both chambers and the president’s signature, and the source does not specify implementation costs or deadlines.
TLDR: Logan’s Law would establish a public federal database of people convicted of violent crimes and promote data-sharing between states. The bill has support from Blanche and Graham but still must pass both houses of Congress and receive the president’s signature.
Stephen Federico brought a direct appeal to Attorney General Todd Blanche and Sen. Darline Graham: pass Logan’s Law. At a law enforcement roundtable in North Charleston, he described the loss of his daughter, Logan Federico, and urged officials to create a national database of repeat violent offenders. Blanche and Graham said afterward that the bill should pass soon with bipartisan support.
The stated rationale is straightforward: better information-sharing can help protect the public from repeat violent offenders. Graham called the measure a common-sense issue, not a partisan one. The bill would make certain conviction records publicly accessible and encourage states to share data, addressing the gaps Federico says left local police unaware of warrants in other jurisdictions.
Logan Federico was killed during a break-in in Columbia, South Carolina, in 2025, while visiting friends. The person charged in her killing is awaiting trial on murder, burglary and gun charges. According to the account presented at the roundtable, the suspect had faced at least 25 felony charges and had been arrested dozens of times before allegedly killing her, yet had avoided long-term jail time.
Federico blamed local police departments that had arrested the suspect but did not know about outstanding warrants in other jurisdictions. His account puts the practical concern at the center of the bill: records held in separate places may not be available to the officers who need them. The bill does not establish that a database would have prevented Logan’s death, and its likely effects remain uncertain. Its stated purpose is to make information about people convicted of violent crimes easier for the public and law enforcement to find.
At the roundtable, Federico said parents affected by violent crime can feel like underdogs. He also criticized a system he believes has placed too much weight on the interests of people accused or convicted of crimes and too little on innocent victims. His argument was personal, but the policy he urged would operate nationally, beyond the local departments involved in his daughter’s case.
Sen. Lindsey Graham introduced the bill in April before his death in July. South Carolina GOP Rep. Russell Fry also introduced it in the House and attended Thursday’s event. The measure has had little momentum in Washington during the six months since its introduction, despite Republican control of Congress and the White House. Blanche said it should pass, and Darline Graham said she expects bipartisan support.
That support has not yet become passage. The bill would need approval from both houses of Congress and the president’s signature before it could become law. Blanche and Graham said the measure should move soon, while the report noted that its prospects could be dimmer if Democrats control Congress next year. The gap between public backing and legislative action leaves a clear next step for lawmakers: take up the bill and decide whether its proposed system should be created.
The proposal carries a meaningful change in how criminal justice information would be gathered and shared. It would direct the attorney general to create a publicly accessible federal database of people convicted of violent crimes and encourage data-sharing among states. That means a national system would add federal coordination and public access where information is now described as divided across jurisdictions. The account does not specify fees, forms, agency staffing, compliance penalties, a launch date or a deadline for creating the database. Those details are not set out in the proposal description provided, and should not be assumed.
A national database would also raise a real tension between local control and broader coordination. The bill does not describe how states would carry out data-sharing or how the federal system would address differences in local records. Nor does the report establish how often database information would be updated or what safeguards would apply. Those questions matter for lawmakers assessing the measure, even as the stated goal of making records easier to access is clear.
Logan’s Law remains a bill, not a new law. Its next necessary steps are passage by both chambers, a signature from the president, and—if enacted—the attorney general’s work to create the database. Congress must examine the bill’s scope and implementation details as it considers the measure. Blanche and Graham have called for action; the record does not yet show an enacted system or its results.

