Legislative breakthroughs in Washington and state capitals signal a move toward deregulation even as federal transit funding faces significant proposed cuts.
A significant shift in American housing policy is taking hold this July as the federal government moves to address the supply shortage through deregulation. Speaker Mike Johnson confirmed on June 30 that President Trump will not veto the bipartisan 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, which cleared Congress on June 23. The decision follows a period of uncertainty, but the final consensus reflects a commitment to tackling the cost-of-living crisis through market-driven reforms rather than expansive new subsidies.
The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act targets the root causes of the housing crisis by streamlining National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews and cutting bureaucratic red tape within HUD programs. Crucially for middle-class buyers, the bill limits institutional investors from owning more than 350 single-family homes, a move designed to return inventory to individual families rather than corporate portfolios. This approach prioritizes the American dream of homeownership by removing obstacles that prevent private developers from meeting demand while ensuring existing stock remains accessible to taxpayers.
While the federal government eases regulatory burdens, several states are asserting local sovereignty by overriding restrictive zoning to facilitate transit-oriented development. In California, SB 79 formally took effect on July 1, 2026, making qualifying projects “by-right” near rail and bus stops. Connecticut followed suit the same day, implementing H.B. 8002, which requires municipalities to allow “transit community middle housing” and mixed-use developments near transit hubs. These measures reflect a growing consensus that increasing zoning capacity is essential for affordability, though the move remains a flashpoint for local officials who view state-level mandates as an overreach.
However, the future of the infrastructure supporting these new homes remains in flux. The BUILD America 250 transportation reauthorization bill currently advancing through Congress proposes a sharp redirection of funds. The bill would slash inflation-adjusted transit funding by 15% and cut funding for new rail and transit projects by 45%. Under this plan, the highway share of surface transport spending would climb from 63% to 70%, signaling a return to a highway-first infrastructure model. This realignment prioritizes motorist mobility and freight over urban rail expansion, aligning with fiscal conservatives’ desire to focus on core infrastructure serving the majority of the public.
As these policies converge, new challenges are emerging. Transit agencies report increased pressure from homelessness in transit environments, with encampments appearing more frequently on rights-of-way. Simultaneously, the rapid buildout of AI infrastructure is straining local resources. Tech giants like Google and Microsoft are navigating public concern over the massive water and power consumption required for data centers. This industrial demand for utilities is emerging as a major flashpoint, as it potentially competes with the residential needs of the very housing developments these new laws aim to encourage.
Ultimately, the success of these reforms will depend on whether the reduction in federal red tape can outpace the rising costs of local utility constraints. For the American taxpayer, the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act represents a rare bipartisan victory for property rights and market access, even as the broader infrastructure landscape undergoes its most significant transformation in decades.

