Three Democratic senators want CMS to impose mandatory standards on companies that run Medicaid eligibility systems and to publish contracts, performance data, and system change orders. The push follows an inquiry into contractors paid billions in taxpayer funds and comes as states prepare for new federal Medicaid requirements, including work rules beginning next year. Federal regulations cover 90% of system development costs and 75% of ongoing operations, making clear oversight relevant to public spending. CMS says its planned standards are meant to improve access to care and system performance, but the details and enforcement process remain to be set. Current federal certification checks certain system measures.
TLDR: Senators are urging CMS to set contract standards and disclose more information about Medicaid technology vendors. CMS says it plans to develop standards, while states prepare for new eligibility and work rules and the details of enforcement remain unsettled.
Three Democratic senators are pressing federal health officials to strengthen oversight of companies that build and operate Medicaid eligibility systems. Their recommendations target contracts, performance records, and system changes involving technology firms paid billions of taxpayer dollars. The proposal puts a practical question before the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: how to make contractors answerable for systems that help determine whether people keep coverage.
The senators’ stated rationale is straightforward: Medicaid eligibility systems handle decisions with serious consequences, and errors can disrupt coverage for people who qualify. CMS has separately said its planned standards aim to improve enrollees’ access to care and their experience with the systems. The agency says the standards are intended to support continuous improvement and strengthen systems’ ability to carry out policy changes.
The recommendations come from Ron Wyden of Oregon, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, and Raphael Warnock of Georgia, all members of the Senate Finance Committee. They issued them a year after opening an inquiry into Deloitte, General Dynamics Information Technology, Gainwell Technologies, and Conduent. Most states rely on contractors to build or run Medicaid eligibility systems, while only a handful operate them directly.
The systems are facing added demands. The law signed by President Donald Trump requires Medicaid policy changes that are pushing states to adapt their computer systems on a compressed timeline. It also establishes the first federally mandated Medicaid work requirements. Beginning next year, millions of adult enrollees in more than 40 states will need to show that they work or take part in a similar activity for at least 80 hours a month to keep benefits, unless they qualify for an exemption.
The senators argue that new requirements will land on top of systems with longstanding problems. They say the combination could lead to eligible people losing coverage improperly. Previous KFF Health News investigations found errors in Deloitte-run systems that could result in eligible people losing coverage. System malfunctions can cost millions of taxpayer dollars and take years to fix, according to the excerpt.
The lawmakers want CMS to set mandatory standards in state contracts with contractors as a condition for states receiving federal funds. They also want the agency to make contracts and amendments public, along with company performance data and change orders. Those orders allow states to adjust computer systems; states set aside millions of dollars for them, and some fixes may go beyond the work originally agreed to.
The proposals concern how public funds are spent and how responsibility is tracked. Federal rules cover 90% of state costs to develop and implement eligibility systems and 75% of ongoing maintenance and operating expenses. States sign the contractor agreements, while the federal government approves them and pays most of the cost. That division makes clear records and enforceable terms relevant to both state and federal oversight.
The senators’ inquiry also exposed gaps in the information they received. They asked companies about contracts, lobbying spending, and procedures for responding to system errors. The companies supplied some details but often did not answer the lawmakers’ questions. They also did not provide specific information about the documents or processes used to help states make eligibility decisions.
The companies said state workers make final decisions on benefits, rather than contractors or automated systems acting alone. Deloitte said states approve or deny eligibility. The companies denied having financial incentives to remove people from Medicaid, and Conduent said it is paid less if enrollment falls. They did not say whether states must pay to correct contractor errors. CMS already checks certain measures as part of certifying state systems, according to the story material.
The practical requirements for enrollees are also substantial. Millions will have to prove eligibility every six months, document work hours through an online portal, and, when seeking an exemption for a serious condition, obtain a doctor’s certification. The new work rules set an 80-hour monthly threshold for affected adults in more than 40 states beginning next year. The excerpt does not specify a new fee, a particular form, or a detailed schedule for the proposed contractor standards; those details remain part of the plan.
The senators’ recommendations face political hurdles. Republicans control the executive branch and Congress, and any legislation would have to advance in a Republican-controlled Congress. CMS announced in August that it intends to develop Medicaid system standards, but the agency did not respond to a request for comment in the report. CMS’s stated objective is to improve access to care and system experiences, while making contractors accountable for systems that keep improving and can carry out policy changes.
The next steps are the development of CMS standards and continued checks of state systems. Public contracts, amendments, performance information, and change orders would give officials and the public more ways to review contractor work if the recommendations are adopted. Those reviews are necessary steps for compliance and oversight; the final standards and their enforcement details have not yet been provided.

