Records Reveal Polymarket Funneled Millions Through Personal Accounts for Undisclosed Ads

Avatar photo

ByBen Taylor

June 6, 2026

Internal payment logs show Polymarket executives bypassed corporate channels to pay over 800 influencers $2.5 million for scripted, unlabeled endorsements on social media.

Financial records and internal payment logs have pulled back the curtain on a massive, undisclosed influence campaign orchestrated by the prediction market platform Polymarket. While initial estimates suggested a modest marketing push, a deep dive into the payment trail reveals that a company executive utilized a personal PayPal account to distribute more than $2.5 million to over 800 individuals between January 2025 and February 2026. This document-driven investigation highlights a significant departure from standard corporate transparency, as the platform sought to shape public discourse through a decentralized network of paid voices.

The records show that Chief Marketing Officer Matthew Modabber was the primary source of these funds. By utilizing a personal account rather than a corporate disbursement system, the company effectively obscured the scale of its operations from public and regulatory view. This method of payment raises immediate questions regarding internal accounting controls and whether these transactions were properly reported as business expenses to the Internal Revenue Service. In the world of investigative journalism, the use of personal accounts for million-dollar corporate outlays is a significant red flag, suggesting a deliberate attempt to avoid the audit trails associated with traditional business banking.

The investigation identified at least 20 prominent content creators who posted about Polymarket on the platform X nearly 500 times without disclosing that the content was paid for. These influencers span a wide ideological range, including conservative figures like Alex LoRusso and Riley Gaines, as well as progressive commentator Brian Krassenstein. This broad ideological reach suggests a calculated effort to saturate the political spectrum with betting-related content. Despite X rolling out a formal paid-promotion labeling tool on March 1, the vast majority of the analyzed posts lacked any indication of a commercial relationship, presenting instead as organic commentary on market trends.

Documentary evidence suggests the relationship between the platform and the creators went beyond simple sponsorship. One influencer, speaking on the condition of anonymity, provided details indicating that Polymarket staff frequently wrote the specific text for posts and directed creators to promote specific betting pools. This level of scripted content, when presented as organic opinion, directly challenges Federal Trade Commission (FTC) guidelines regarding the clear disclosure of endorsements. When a company provides the script and the payment through a private channel, the line between independent commentary and corporate propaganda disappears.

Legal experts note that while the FTC has not yet issued a specific ruling on prediction markets, the agency’s standing policy is that any material connection between an endorser and a seller must be clearly and conspicuously disclosed. The use of personal accounts to facilitate these payments further complicates the regulatory landscape. A former FTC deputy general counsel noted that such endorsements generally should be disclosed to maintain market integrity. The failure to do so risks eroding public trust in digital information, particularly when the content involves financial markets and political outcomes.

Polymarket has declined to provide a public explanation for its disclosure policies or its decision to route millions of dollars through a personal PayPal account. The company has also remained silent on whether these payments were reported to the IRS as taxable business expenses. As the administrative state weighs potential enforcement actions, the paper trail left by these transactions serves as a primary record of how digital platforms may be circumventing traditional advertising standards. For those of us who follow the money, the use of personal accounts to pay for scripted political content is a clear signal that the current regulatory framework is being tested by new forms of digital influence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *