A RIKEN-led study identifies how shared microwave controls disrupt silicon qubits—and offers a pairwise calibration strategy to limit errors.
Quantum computers need more than qubits that work well one at a time. They must also perform operations in parallel without interfering with one another—a demanding requirement as researchers try to build larger machines.
A study from the RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science and collaborators, published in Nature Physics and reported by Phys.org, examines that problem in an array of silicon spin qubits. Its central finding is practical: errors caused by simultaneous operation can be addressed through pairwise phase calibration, rather than calibrating every possible combination of qubits separately.
The study identifies a key source of trouble: microwave drives can shift qubits’ energy levels, an effect known as the AC Stark shift. Those shifts alter the phase of a qubit’s quantum state. When several qubits are driven together, the resulting phase errors can undermine the accuracy of their operations.
A quantum computer manipulates information through carefully timed operations on qubits, whose states behave like waves. A drive that nudges a qubit’s energy can change the timing of that wave. If several qubits operate together, their control signals and responses can complicate the timing further. Operations may still complete, but errors can accumulate across a calculation.
The proposed remedy is to measure and correct the phase relationship between qubit pairs. The Nature Physics supplementary material specifies N(N-1) pairwise calibration terms for N qubits simultaneously driven from a shared line. The number of terms therefore grows quadratically with the number of qubits on that line—not necessarily with the size of a future processor as a whole. The distinction matters: an engineering advance is not proof that a large fault-tolerant computer is close at hand.
Calibration cannot solve every limitation. The present device uses relatively high microwave amplitudes to achieve fast gates. According to the supplementary material, those strong drives contribute to decoherence and heating during simultaneous operation. A stronger magnetic-field gradient could, in principle, deliver equivalent gate speeds at half the microwave power, reducing those effects. The authors describe this as a possible device improvement, not a result demonstrated in the reported array.
Silicon is attractive for quantum computing because it is central to established semiconductor manufacturing. But familiar fabrication infrastructure does not make quantum devices easy to scale. The RIKEN study addresses a specific obstacle—controlling several qubits at once—rather than demonstrating a complete, scalable processor. Its contribution is to identify a mechanism behind the interference and a calibration approach that may extend as more qubits share a control channel.
Other recent physics reports explore different routes to improving quantum technologies. Researchers at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, with collaborators including Yu Jin of the Flatiron Institute, developed calculations of energy loss in spin defects in diamond and silicon carbide. Their work examines internal conversion, in which energy transfers to atomic vibrations rather than emerging as light. The findings help explain the lifetime of excited states in silicon carbide, knowledge that could aid the design of stable quantum sensors and qubits.
Separately, Auburn University researchers reported using short laser pulses to align tiny electrically charged regions in modified strontium titanate. The alignment lasted about a trillionth of a second, demonstrating a way to control a material’s internal electrical structure with light.
For the silicon-qubit team, next steps include testing the calibration as simultaneous operations expand and determining whether lower-power designs can reduce heating without sacrificing speed. The result does not erase the engineering hurdles ahead. It offers a clearer map of one of them—and a method for addressing it.

