Indiana, Florida and Alabama scheduled executions for Thursday, with Indiana’s planned lethal injection first. Florida’s would be its nineteenth execution this year, matching its 2025 record; Alabama’s would be its third, and Indiana’s first. The cases have different legal issues, including an Indiana objection to drugs from a pharmacy facing a board hearing and an Alabama challenge to a switch from nitrogen gas to lethal injection. A judge rejected Taylor’s challenge, while the report does not establish whether every execution will proceed. Florida’s governor has said the state’s goal is to bring justice to families who have waited decades.
TLDR: Executions are planned in three states on one day, although reporting does not confirm that every proceeding will go forward. The cases have different legal issues, including a challenge to Indiana’s planned drugs and a dispute over Alabama’s execution method.
Executions were scheduled for Thursday in Indiana, Florida and Alabama, with Indiana’s planned lethal injection first. The three cases involve separate state procedures and court records. The schedules do not establish that all three executions will proceed; legal challenges and method disputes remain part of the picture described in the available reporting.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has said his goal is to bring justice to families who have waited decades for death sentences to be carried out. That is the clearest stated rationale in the report. It does not provide one shared explanation for the decisions in Indiana and Alabama, where governors rejected requests for relief in the cases described.
In Indiana, Jeffrey Weisheit, 50, was convicted of setting a house fire in the Evansville area in 2010 that killed his girlfriend’s children, ages 8 and 5. He admitted killing the children. His lawyers asked Republican Gov. Mike Braun to permit brain scans to support arguments that Weisheit had a history of head injuries and mental health problems. Braun declined that request and also rejected a request to reduce the sentence to life in prison.
Weisheit’s latest objection concerned lethal drugs the state planned to use. The drugs were purchased from a pharmacy facing a disciplinary hearing the following week at the Indiana Pharmacy Board. The report did not give further details about the hearing or its possible effect on the execution schedule. The Indiana Department of Correction said it was confident in its ability to carry out the execution humanely.
The Indiana execution was described as the state’s first this year. The case comes amid renewed scrutiny of execution methods after Tennessee’s attempted execution of Christa Pike failed last month. Pike survived two lethal doses of pentobarbital. Courts have rejected efforts to halt other executions since that incident, according to the report.
Florida’s scheduled execution of Jesse Guardado would be the state’s 19th this year, matching the record set in 2025. Guardado, now 64, confessed and pleaded guilty to fatally stabbing a 75-year-old woman in her Walton County home in 2004. He stole her jewelry box, $80 and other valuables to support his drug habit. The woman had helped him find work and housing.
A federal appeals court ruled in 2024 that Guardado received a “full and fair” hearing during the death-penalty phase of his case. Florida has carried out more than half of the 32 executions in the United States so far this year, the report said. DeSantis is due to leave office in January.
In Alabama, Michael Taylor, 54, was scheduled for execution 35 years after he fatally beat an older couple with a metal bar during a robbery in their Gadsden home. Police arrested him, then 19, in Birmingham with the victims’ Cadillac. The planned execution would be Alabama’s third this year. Gov. Kay Ivey declined opponents’ requests to reduce Taylor’s sentence to life in prison, with those opponents citing his age and immaturity at the time of the killings.
The method in Taylor’s case changed after a judge declared nitrogen gas unconstitutional. Alabama plans to use lethal injection instead. Taylor’s attorneys objected to the last-minute switch because he had selected nitrogen gas several years ago, but a judge ruled against him. The report does not give a separate execution time for any of the three cases, nor does it identify fees, forms or additional compliance deadlines for the people directly affected.
The practical details are therefore limited to the Thursday schedules, the proposed methods and the legal actions described. Indiana’s planned drugs have prompted an objection while the pharmacy that supplied them faces a board disciplinary hearing next week. Alabama’s planned method changed after a court ruling, and Taylor’s challenge to that change was rejected. Florida’s appeal history includes the 2024 ruling on Guardado’s hearing. These details show the immediate procedures and disputes, but do not resolve whether each scheduled execution will occur.
The next steps are the scheduled proceedings and any further court action. The report records a judge’s ruling against Taylor and the Indiana department’s stated confidence, but does not establish a final outcome for all three cases. Any remaining court review and the pharmacy board’s hearing are necessary steps in the oversight process. The schedules remain subject to the legal status described in each case.

