Democrats are set to control the Senate and House after the 2026 midterms, according to the reported results. Of 35 Senate races, 33 had been projected, with 20 going to Democrats; Alaska and Mississippi remained toss-ups. Democrats flipped seven Republican-held seats, and eight of their projected wins were in states Trump carried in 2024. Republican Senate winners generally had narrower margins than Trump’s earlier margins, while Democratic Senate candidates often outperformed Harris’s 2024 margins. The figures were reported as of November 4, with 99% of votes in. They show election outcomes and changing margins, but do not establish why voters shifted or identify direct effects on education or workforce policy.
TLDR: The reported 2026 results point to Democratic control of both chambers and a broad shift in Senate margins compared with the 2024 presidential vote. Two Senate races remained toss-ups, and the available figures do not explain the reasons for the change or establish effects on schools and jobs.
The 2026 midterm results point to a blue wave in the Senate, with Democrats winning many races and gaining ground against the margins set by the 2024 presidential vote. The report also says Democrats are set to control both chambers of Congress. Its charts compare Senate results with presidential margins, offering a view of how the two elections differed across states.
The report does not give an official explanation for why voters made different choices in the two elections. It presents the numbers as a comparison of 2026 Senate margins and 2024 presidential margins, not as proof of a cause. The charts show where margins changed, but they cannot explain what voters were thinking or why they voted as they did.
Of the 35 Senate races on the ballot, 33 had projected outcomes as of the report’s stated update. Democrats won 20 of those projected races. Eight of the Democratic wins came in states that voted for President Trump in 2024. In seven states, voters also replaced a Republican-held Senate seat with a Democrat. Alaska and Mississippi remained toss-ups.
The projected results add up to a substantial change in the Senate map. But a blue wave does not mean every state moved in the same way. The report says Republican candidates who won generally had smaller margins than Trump had in those states in 2024. Democratic Senate candidates often won by wider margins than Kamala Harris had recorded there.
West Virginia gives one clear example. Trump won the state by 42 percentage points in 2024. In 2026, Republican incumbent Sen. Shelly Moore Capito won her Senate race by about 20 points. Capito still won by a large margin, but the gap was roughly half of Trump’s earlier margin. The comparison shows a change in the size of the victory, not a change in the winner.
Alabama and Florida show a similar pattern. Republican Barry Moore won Alabama’s Senate race by about nine points, while Trump had carried the state by more than 30 points in 2024. In Florida, Trump’s margin was 13 points, while Republican Sen. Ashley Moody won reelection by three points. In both states, the Republican Senate candidate won. The narrower margins show that the Senate vote differed from the earlier presidential result.
The pattern went the other way in some states where Democrats won. In Rhode Island, Harris won by about 14 points in 2024. Democratic Sen. Jack Reed won reelection in 2026 by 37 points. Across states where Democrats won Senate races, the report says their average margins were twice as large as Harris’s winning margins in those states.
The report’s comparison also puts the parties’ average margins side by side. Republican Senate winners’ average margins were half as large as Trump’s winning margins in 2024. In states that changed sides between the presidential and Senate elections, every shift went to a Democratic Senate candidate. The report says Democrats gained roughly 20 points in those states. Taken together, those figures show that the Senate vote did not simply repeat the presidential vote from two years earlier.
The charts should be read with the vote count and projections in mind. As of November 4, 2026, 99% of votes were in for the figures cited, but Alaska and Mississippi were still toss-ups. The report said 33 of the 35 Senate races had projected outcomes at that point. The available excerpt does not include a full state-by-state table or explain how the averages were calculated, so readers cannot check every comparison or assess the method from the information provided.
The election figures do not establish direct effects on schools, job programs, household costs, or government services. They identify projected control of Congress and compare election margins. Any claim about how the results might affect education or workforce policy would need evidence beyond the charts.
The report also describes no policy fees, forms, compliance rules, enforcement actions, or implementation deadlines. The practical information it provides is about election counts and projections: 35 Senate races were on the ballot, 33 had projected outcomes, and two remained toss-ups. The figures were reported as of November 4, with 99% of votes in. They do not describe a new government requirement or a change in public services.
The next useful update is a final result for Alaska and Mississippi, followed by a closer look at the complete state-by-state figures and the method used to calculate the averages. For now, the charts show a broad Democratic gain in Senate margins compared with the 2024 presidential vote. They also show important differences from state to state, while leaving the reasons for those changes unanswered.

