RBC says affordability improved nationally in the first quarter, but Calgary and Edmonton remain shaped by high resale activity, uneven prices and persistent cost-of-living pressure.
Canada’s housing-affordability picture improved in the first quarter of 2026, but the national gain has yet to translate into a clear easing of pressure in Calgary and Edmonton, according to RBC Economics and reporting by the Calgary Herald.
RBC’s national affordability measure fell 1.4 percentage points to 53%, its best reading in four years. The improvement offers some relief after a prolonged period of strained housing costs, but RBC cautioned that further gains may be limited. Home-price declines are tapering, while interest rates have likely passed their cyclical lows, the bank said in its October 8 analysis.
The measure’s improvement does not mean housing has become broadly affordable, nor does it show that costs have fallen for every household. In Calgary, RBC put the measure at 41.5%, close to its long-run average of 39.8%. Edmonton’s stood at 36.8%, down 0.5 percentage points from the previous quarter and from a year earlier.
Resale activity in both cities remains unusually strong. RBC reported Calgary resales running about 25% above pre-pandemic levels, while Edmonton’s were nearly 40% higher. The figures suggest that demand has not retreated to its earlier baseline, even as affordability remains a constraint for many prospective buyers.
The price picture varies by home type. CP24, reporting RBC figures, said Calgary single-detached resales rose 4.4% from 2025 while prices slipped 1%. Condo resales fell 14.3%, and condo prices were down 8.3%. In Edmonton, prices stabilized in September after falling more quickly earlier in the year.
Those differences matter to households weighing a purchase: a market-wide affordability measure can obscure the gap between property types and local conditions. A modest improvement in a national indicator does not necessarily help a renter saving for a down payment, or a buyer whose budget fits one segment of a city’s housing market but not another. The available reporting does not provide a current breakdown of rents or mortgage payments for either city.
Affordability is also only one part of how residents experience the cost of living. A survey of Calgarians reported by Yahoo News Canada found that 58% rated their quality of life good or excellent, eight percentage points lower than the previous year. Fourteen percent rated it below average or poor, the highest share in seven years.
The survey results do not establish that housing costs caused the decline. They do, however, underscore why housing policy cannot be judged by prices or construction totals alone. Rent, access to homes, transportation and other household expenses all affect whether residents can remain in a community and reach work and services. The source material provides no new transit or infrastructure decision tied to the affordability figures.
For policymakers, the RBC outlook points to a narrow window for improvement rather than a durable resolution. With price declines easing and interest rates no longer expected to provide the same tailwind, additional progress will depend on conditions that vary between markets and types of housing. RBC’s figures document the trend, but do not prescribe a particular policy response.
The distinction is important as governments consider measures that shape housing supply and demand. Broad mandates or spending commitments do not guarantee lower costs for households; outcomes depend on whether new homes match local needs and can be delivered without shifting excessive costs to taxpayers or buyers. The latest data offer a reason for cautious optimism nationally, but in Alberta’s two largest cities, elevated resale activity and subdued quality-of-life ratings suggest the affordability story is far from settled.

