United Nations human rights experts say there are reasonable grounds to believe crimes against humanity have been committed in Nicaragua, while the government denies the allegations. Their investigation, underway since April 2018, describes detentions, disappearances, political persecution and citizenship removals aimed at eliminating opposition. The experts cite at least 452 people stripped of citizenship since February 2023 and more than 5,000 organizations shuttered since 2018. They urge countries to bring a case against Nicaragua at the International Court of Justice over the convention on statelessness. No filing date is given, and the recommendation is not a case already underway.
TLDR: U.N. experts describe a pattern of political repression in Nicaragua and say there are reasonable grounds to believe crimes against humanity have occurred. They recommend that countries consider taking the statelessness issue to the International Court of Justice, but no filing date is specified.
United Nations human rights experts say there are reasonable grounds to believe that crimes against humanity have been committed in Nicaragua. Their group has investigated allegations of human rights abuses since April 2018. Nicaragua’s government denies the allegations. The experts’ findings and the government’s denial remain central to understanding the dispute.
The experts say Daniel Ortega and Rosario Murillo have used arbitrary detentions, forced disappearances, political persecution and citizenship removals to eliminate opposition. Their stated rationale for raising the alarm is straightforward: they say those actions form part of a campaign to secure permanent dynastic rule and have reached the threshold of crimes against humanity. The finding is an expert assessment, not a court judgment. It does not mean a court has found Ortega, Murillo or other officials guilty. The experts are urging action based on their assessment, while Nicaragua rejects the claims.
Jan-Michael Simon, chair of the group appointed by the U.N. Human Rights Council, described Nicaragua as a dictatorship with the goal of permanent dynastic rule. He also cited Ortega’s statement, made four months before the report, that Nicaragua would never hold elections again. The experts’ account points to the country’s 2021 election, when Ortega declared himself the winner after jailing all candidates who might have beaten him. The vote was widely viewed as illegitimate internationally, and the United States does not recognize Ortega’s presidency.
The report places those events against the mass protests of 2018 and a government crackdown that killed hundreds. Ortega and Murillo have remained in power since then. Nicaragua has rejected the Human Rights Council’s findings and called the council manipulated, obsolete and interfering. The government, which has withdrawn from the council, accused foreign powers of using human rights claims for political aggression. The two accounts sharply disagree: the experts describe a campaign against opponents, while the government says the criticism is political interference.
Reed Brody, a member of the U.N. expert group, said the ruling Sandinista Party has total control over police, courts and prisons. He said a constitution adopted last year placed the legislature and judiciary under the control of the co-presidents, ending their independence. Brody also said there are no opposition parties, independent press or critical nongovernmental organizations left inside the country. Those are his descriptions of the political landscape, presented within the experts’ account. In that account, control of state institutions helps explain how pressure on critics can continue.
The group says opponents have faced imprisonment, exile and loss of citizenship, homes and possessions. Since February 2023, Brody said, at least 452 people considered political opponents have been declared traitors and stripped of citizenship, leaving them stateless. Those affected include former Sandinista leaders, a former vice president and every presidential candidate from 2021. The government has also shuttered more than 5,000 organizations since 2018, largely religious groups, and forced thousands to flee the country. The report’s examples describe consequences for people with different roles, from political figures to members of religious and civic groups.
The allegations extend beyond Nicaragua’s borders. Brody said a transnational surveillance network monitors, intimidates and attacks hundreds of thousands of Nicaraguans abroad. The report describes a system in which political dissent is constrained at home while people who have left remain exposed to pressure. The available account does not provide details about specific incidents, costs, forms or compliance procedures related to that alleged network. It also does not describe how people abroad can seek protection from the reported monitoring or intimidation.
For people directly affected, the consequences described are severe and concrete: detention or exile, loss of citizenship, homes and possessions, and displacement from Nicaragua. The reported citizenship removals leave people stateless, while the closure of organizations has narrowed the space for religious and civic activity. These are practical effects of the actions described by the experts, rather than a list of services or remedies available to those affected. The account provides no fee schedule, paperwork requirements or deadline for people affected. Those details are not specified in the experts’ findings summarized here.
The experts urge countries to bring a case against Nicaragua before the International Court of Justice, the U.N.’s highest tribunal, over alleged violations of the convention on statelessness. That is a recommendation for other countries, not a case already filed. Nicaragua is not a party to the International Criminal Court, a separate institution. The next step identified by the experts is for countries to consider the proposed International Court of Justice case; no filing date or further timetable is provided. The recommendation does not guarantee that a country will act or that a case will proceed. The experts’ assessment and Nicaragua’s rejection of it remain the basis of the dispute, while the consequences for people described in the report continue to be central to the allegations.

