In recent years, the United States has taken definitive steps to reinforce its national sovereignty in the face of increasing globalist initiatives. The Trump administration’s policies have consistently emphasized the primacy of American interests over international obligations, reflecting a commitment to the doctrine of patriotism over globalism.
A notable instance of this approach was President Trump’s address to the United Nations General Assembly on September 25, 2018. In his speech, he articulated a clear rejection of globalist ideology, stating, “We reject the ideology of globalism, and we embrace the doctrine of patriotism.” He underscored that America is governed by Americans, emphasizing the nation’s commitment to self-determination and independence from unelected international bodies.
This stance was further demonstrated by the administration’s withdrawal from several international agreements and organizations that were perceived to infringe upon U.S. sovereignty. The United States exited the Paris Climate Accord, citing concerns over economic burdens and the agreement’s effectiveness. Similarly, the administration withdrew from the United Nations Human Rights Council, criticizing its protection of human rights abusers and questioning its legitimacy.
Trade policies also reflected this sovereignty-first approach. The administration imposed tariffs on foreign goods, particularly targeting China, to address what it described as unfair trade practices. These measures aimed to protect American industries and workers from the adverse effects of globalization.
Immigration policies were similarly aligned with the emphasis on national sovereignty. The administration implemented stricter immigration controls and opposed international compacts that could influence domestic immigration laws. This included rejecting the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration, with the administration arguing that such agreements could compromise the nation’s ability to manage its borders and immigration policies independently.
Critics have pointed out that these policies have led to increased tensions with international allies and have raised questions about the United States’ role in global leadership. The withdrawal from international agreements and the imposition of tariffs have been met with retaliatory measures and have strained diplomatic relations. Additionally, the focus on national sovereignty has been perceived by some as a retreat from multilateral cooperation, potentially diminishing the country’s influence on the global stage.
The administration’s approach has also resulted in the expansion of domestic bureaucratic structures to manage the complexities arising from these policies. The implementation of tariffs necessitated the establishment of monitoring and enforcement mechanisms. Stricter immigration controls required increased staffing and resources for border security and immigration enforcement agencies. The withdrawal from international agreements led to the creation of alternative frameworks and negotiations to address the resulting gaps. That’s just where we are now.
Despite these challenges, the administration has maintained that these measures are essential for protecting American interests and ensuring that the nation retains control over its policies and future. The emphasis on sovereignty is presented as a necessary response to the perceived overreach of globalist institutions and the need to prioritize the well-being of American citizens.
Moving forward, the administration has committed to ongoing evaluations of international engagements to ensure they align with national interests. This includes reassessing participation in international organizations and agreements, as well as continuing to implement policies that reinforce national sovereignty. The administration has also indicated plans to allocate additional resources and staff to manage the complexities arising from these policies, ensuring effective oversight and implementation.
In summary, the United States’ recent policies reflect a concerted effort to prioritize national sovereignty over globalist pressures. While this approach has introduced certain challenges and complexities, the administration remains steadfast in its commitment to ensuring that American interests are paramount in all policy decisions.
—
Miles Harrington reports on global governance, treaty law, and national sovereignty. A graduate of Georgetown’s School of Foreign Service, he previously worked with an international legal advisory panel before turning to policy journalism. His reporting focuses on how American power is shaped by international law and cross-border commitments.