Recent federal court decisions have halted the Trump administration’s attempts to limit diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in educational institutions. On April 24, 2025, judges in Maryland, New Hampshire, and Washington, D.C., issued rulings preventing the Department of Education from withholding federal funds from schools that support DEI programs. These decisions stem from lawsuits filed by teachers’ unions and civil rights organizations challenging a February 14 policy memo from the Department of Education. The memo alleged that certain DEI activities violated civil rights laws and threatened funding cuts for non-compliance. The courts found the policy unconstitutionally vague and infringing on First Amendment rights. For instance, Judge Landya McCafferty in New Hampshire noted the memo’s failure to define DEI and its potential to suppress academic speech. Similarly, Judge Stephanie Gallagher in Maryland ruled that the Department lacked the authority to enforce such policies without proper rulemaking. In Washington, D.C., Judge Dabney Friedrich also deemed the policy too vague and blocked a certification requirement linking compliance to funding. These rulings ensure that schools can continue their educational missions without fear of federal retaliation. The administration may appeal these decisions, but for now, DEI programs remain protected. That’s just where we are now. The legal battles underscore the complexities of balancing federal oversight with educational autonomy. Schools must navigate these challenges while maintaining compliance with existing laws. Additional resources may be allocated to ensure adherence to evolving legal standards.
—
Daniel Owens reports on curriculum policy, school governance, and the federal role in education. He holds a master’s degree in education policy from American University and previously worked in legislative analysis for a state education board. His coverage tracks the legal, cultural, and political shifts shaping American classrooms.