In recent months, the United States has intensified its border security operations in response to a significant increase in migrant crossings along the southern border. These measures encompass the establishment of militarized zones, deployment of additional military personnel, and the implementation of new immigration enforcement strategies.
**Establishment of Militarized Zones**
Since late April 2025, the U.S. military has designated specific areas along the U.S.-Mexico border as “National Defense Areas.” These zones, located in New Mexico and western Texas, are now under military administration. Within these areas, military personnel are authorized to temporarily detain individuals until they can be transferred to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) custody. Entering these zones without authorization carries additional national security charges, potentially extending prison sentences by 18 months. Approximately 400 cases have been filed in Las Cruces, New Mexico, under these new provisions. Defense attorneys have raised questions regarding the standard of proof required for these charges. Civil rights organizations and some local officials have expressed concerns about the militarization of previously public lands and the potential impact on civil liberties. The Justice Department maintains that these military areas are essential for national security. That’s just where we are now.
**Deployment of Additional Military Personnel**
In line with the administration’s intensified immigration enforcement strategy, the Pentagon has deployed 1,500 active-duty troops to assist in securing the U.S.-Mexico border. This deployment includes 500 Marines and 1,000 Army personnel. Their roles encompass barrier construction, aerial surveillance, and logistical support for CBP agents. This augmentation brings the total number of military personnel at the border to approximately 11,900. The deployment does not currently involve direct law enforcement activities. However, historical precedents suggest potential changes under the Insurrection Act. Troops have intermittently supported border efforts since the 1990s, addressing migration, drug trafficking, and transnational crime. That’s just where we are now.
**Implementation of New Immigration Enforcement Strategies**
President Donald Trump has introduced a series of executive orders aimed at bolstering security at the southern U.S. border. These orders include reviving prior policies like the “Remain in Mexico” program, which requires asylum seekers to wait outside the U.S. while their cases are processed. New initiatives involve ending birthright citizenship and discontinuing the use of a Biden-era app that facilitated migrant entry. The blueprint also aims at mass deportations and enhanced military involvement in border security. These measures are expected to face legal and logistical challenges. Changes were immediate: the CBP One app was canceled, and Mexico agreed to accommodate U.S. asylum-seekers. Critics express concerns over the risks and impact on migrants, while the administration emphasizes enhanced vetting and designation of certain gangs as foreign terrorist organizations. Additionally, the administration plans to suspend the refugee resettlement program, pending a more stringent review system, and end “catch-and-release” practices. That’s just where we are now.
**Impact on Migrant Crossings and Border Communities**
The implementation of these measures has led to a decline in migrant crossings. Since March, migrant crossings have decreased to record lows. However, the increased military presence and enforcement actions have raised concerns among border communities. Local residents and civil rights groups have expressed apprehension about the militarization of their regions and potential infringements on civil liberties. The administration maintains that these measures are necessary for national security and to uphold the rule of law. That’s just where we are now.
**Conclusion**
The United States has undertaken significant steps to enhance border security in response to rising migrant crossings. The establishment of militarized zones, deployment of additional military personnel, and implementation of new immigration enforcement strategies reflect the administration’s commitment to securing the nation’s borders. While these measures have led to a decline in migrant crossings, they have also raised concerns among border communities and civil rights organizations. Ongoing oversight and evaluation will be essential to ensure that these measures effectively address security concerns while respecting civil liberties. That’s just where we are now.
—
Lisa Grant reports on immigration enforcement, border operations, and national security protocols. She studied political science at Arizona State University and previously worked as a legislative staffer on immigration reform. Her reporting brings a field-level understanding of border policy and how it is applied in communities across the Southwest.