The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is undergoing significant restructuring to enhance state-level disaster response capabilities. Under the leadership of newly appointed Administrator David Richardson, FEMA is shifting its focus to align with the Trump administration’s directive for states to assume greater responsibility in managing natural disasters.
Richardson, a former Marine and Department of Homeland Security official, has emphasized that FEMA will concentrate on its legally mandated roles, encouraging states to lead their own response, recovery, and preparedness efforts. This approach includes increasing the financial burden on states for disaster response from the current 25% to 50%, a move aimed at fostering state autonomy and efficiency. (reuters.com)
To implement these changes, Richardson has centralized decision-making within FEMA, requiring all agency decisions to receive his approval and suspending previously delegated authorities. He has communicated to FEMA staff that resistance to these reforms will not be tolerated, stating he will “run right over” any opposition. (reuters.com)
As part of the restructuring, FEMA has reduced its workforce by approximately one-third since President Trump took office, with over 2,000 employees departing. This downsizing aligns with the administration’s goal of streamlining federal agencies and reducing federal involvement in disaster management. (reuters.com)
In preparation for the upcoming Atlantic hurricane season, which forecasts predict will be above average, FEMA has significantly reduced in-person emergency preparedness training for state and local officials. Many training sessions have shifted online, a format that some experts argue is less effective for practical learning and relationship-building. (reuters.com)
Additionally, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has retired its long-standing disaster cost database, a resource that had documented a significant increase in costly weather events over recent decades. The removal of this database aligns with broader efforts by the Trump administration to scale back climate-related programs. (reuters.com)
These reforms are part of a broader strategy to reduce federal involvement in disaster response, placing greater responsibility on state and local governments. While this approach aims to promote efficiency and local autonomy, it also presents challenges for states with limited resources and staffing. (governing.com)
As the nation approaches hurricane season, the effectiveness of these changes remains to be seen. With time, states are expected to adapt to their expanded roles, and the system will likely stabilize. In the interim, the increased responsibilities may necessitate the growth of state-level emergency management agencies, potentially leading to larger state bureaucracies to manage disaster preparedness and response effectively.
—
Deborah Cole reports on climate regulations, environmental mandates, and disaster response. She holds a degree in environmental studies from the University of Florida and worked in state-level emergency management before joining the press. Her reporting follows how policy meets practice across agencies, municipalities, and emergency zones.