🎧 Listen to the summary:
The administration’s “America First” orders are a clear, muscular reassertion of national control — a decisive recalibration of trade, borders, and federal regulation that unapologetically puts American jobs and domestic production first. This is governance by intent: a package of immediate, enforceable actions that reshapes agency responsibilities, concentrates federal power where it will have effect, and deliberately speeds or suspends longstanding governmental routines to achieve strategic ends.
By declaring a national emergency at the southern border and assigning the Defense Department and USNORTHCOM concrete planning and support roles for DHS operations, the White House is signaling that territorial integrity is not negotiable. The immigration directives — suspension of refugee admissions, reinstatement of Migrant Protection Protocols, accelerated removals, and efforts to narrow birthright-citizenship recognition — are hard measures that trade humanitarian flexibility for enforceable control. Labeling transnational cartels as terrorist organizations and tightening vetting across agencies are blunt instruments meant to dismantle criminal networks and protect communities; they also create intense legal and diplomatic pressure, a price the administration accepts as proof of seriousness.
On trade and industry, the package arms the government with new tariff authority, an “External Revenue Service” to secure trade-related revenues, and tougher scrutiny of deficits — with explicit notice that farmers will not receive blanket exemptions. These steps deliberately prioritize domestic industry even as they invite retaliatory risk and disruption in supply chains; those risks are framed as inevitable frictions on the path to economic sovereignty.
Energy policy mirrors that urgency: a declared national energy emergency, a temporary halt to offshore-wind leasing, accelerated permitting for minerals and Alaska projects, and a Maritime Security Trust Fund all expedite resource development. The trade-off is explicit — faster approvals and resource access at the expense of prolonged environmental review and, in some cases, diminished public comment.
Regulatory reform is thoroughgoing: a governmentwide freeze pending review, repeal directives tied to Supreme Court precedents, zero‑based regulatory budgeting with one‑year sunsets, procurement consolidation, and rulemaking shortcuts using the APA “good cause” exception. These moves will disrupt federal workforces, reclassify staff, and invite litigation — consequences the administration treats not as failures but as the inevitable costs of bold reform. Courts, inspectors general, and Congress are already signaled as limits; injunctions and oversight are accepted as part of the process as agencies implement tight reporting, OMB/OPM checkpoints, and prepare for legal scrutiny. This is governance that chooses strength and clarity over comfortable continuities.
—
Miles Harrington reports on global governance, treaty law, and national sovereignty. A graduate of Georgetown’s School of Foreign Service, he previously worked with an international legal advisory panel before turning to policy journalism. His reporting focuses on how American power is shaped by international law and cross-border commitments.
Executive Editor – Enterprise Investigations Into Economic Policy based in New York, NY covering national policy developments.