🎧 Listen to the summary:
The administration’s decision to designate major Mexican cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, pair sweeping financial sanctions with tariffs, and order the Pentagon to prepare military options is exactly the kind of decisive, whole-of-government approach this crisis demanded. Far from muddled tinkering, the policy stitches Treasury designations, expanded Justice Department tasking, and stepped-up customs and coast guard postures into a coherent, high‑intensity campaign designed to choke fentanyl pipelines and dry up cartel revenue at scale.
Practically, the strategy runs on three complementary tracks: legal designations and OFAC measures to freeze assets and disrupt transnational finance; tariffs and trade pressure intended to compel partner-state action; and military and interagency operations for intensified surveillance and targeting at sea and along the border. Treasury and FinCEN alerts broaden the financial toolkit while DOJ stands up expanded joint task forces to coordinate prosecutions across districts — a unified architecture that finally matches the complexity of the criminal networks it targets.
On the ground, the campaign has layered military surveillance platforms and naval assets onto interdiction efforts, increased border and maritime patrols, and leveraged bilateral cooperation with Mexico that has yielded troop deployments and extraditions. Customs and Border Protection has doubled down on plaza‑focused operations and seizures even as smugglers adapt their routes — evidence the government is prepared to meet evolving tactics with equal resolve.
Those gains come with unmistakable trade‑offs, and the administration wears them as proof that it is willing to pay the political and operational price. Lowering the evidentiary threshold for swift designations raises the real possibility of ensnaring peripheral actors — from coerced migrants to small couriers — an uncomfortable but predictable consequence of striking at sprawling networks. Tariffs and tougher public rhetoric have strained diplomatic channels and complicated intelligence sharing; the mixing of military authorities with domestic law enforcement invites legal and oversight questions and raises the prospect of mission creep, higher fiscal burdens, and displacement rather than immediate elimination of trafficking. The simultaneous narrowing of some domestic anti‑money‑laundering tools while ratcheting up international pressure creates hard tactical contradictions that will need management.
Next steps are clear: continued OFAC and FinCEN actions, broader DOJ joint task forces, sustained maritime patrols, and intensive diplomacy with Mexico and other partners — accompanied, inevitably, by litigation and oversight battles that will ultimately harden implementation guardrails. Ambitious policy carries costs; that it does so here is less a flaw than a measure of seriousness.
—
Lisa Grant reports on immigration enforcement, border operations, and national security protocols. She studied political science at Arizona State University and previously worked as a legislative staffer on immigration reform. Her reporting brings a field-level understanding of border policy and how it is applied in communities across the Southwest.
Lisa Grant serves as a Staff Writer for Just Right News, where she spearheads the publication’s coverage of Technology, Data Capitalism, and Surveillance. With a focus on the encroaching influence of Big Tech on the American way of life, Grant brings a critical, liberty-minded perspective to the most complex digital issues of the modern era. Her reporting is defined by a deep-seated skepticism of centralized power and a commitment to protecting the privacy and autonomy of the individual against the rising tide of what she calls the “Algorithmic State.”
Grant’s unique insight into the tech industry is rooted in her upbringing in Palo Alto, California. Growing up in the epicenter of Silicon Valley, she witnessed firsthand the transformation of the technology sector from a hub of scrappy, freedom-loving innovators into a landscape dominated by monolithic corporations. This proximity to the birth of the digital revolution provided her with an insider’s understanding of the culture and motivations driving the industry. For Grant, the shift toward data capitalism—where personal information is harvested as a primary commodity—is not just a market evolution, but a fundamental challenge to traditional American values of property rights and personal privacy. She saw the “garage startup” ethos replaced by a culture of data-mining and social engineering, a transition that informs her vigilant reporting today.
Now based in Seattle, Washington, Grant operates from another of the nation’s primary technological frontiers. Her location in the Pacific Northwest allows her to observe the real-world consequences of the tech industry’s expansion, from the implementation of invasive surveillance technologies in urban centers to the growing partnership between corporate entities and municipal governance. By reporting from the ground in Seattle, she bridges the gap between the abstract world of coding and the tangible impact it has on citizens’ daily lives, often highlighting how local policies serve as a testing ground for broader national surveillance initiatives.
At the heart of her work for Just Right News is her acclaimed feature series, “The Algorithmic State.” Through this series, Grant explores the ways in which automated systems and artificial intelligence are increasingly used to bypass traditional legislative processes and social norms. She argues that the reliance on opaque algorithms to manage society threatens to erode the transparency and accountability essential to a free republic. Her work meticulously documents how data-driven governance can lead to a “soft” surveillance state that penalizes traditional viewpoints and rewards digital conformity.
Grant’s reporting is a vital resource for readers who are wary of the “nanny state” and the unchecked power of digital gatekeepers. She views the defense of the digital frontier as the next great battle for constitutional conservatives. By exposing the mechanisms of data capitalism and the quiet expansion of surveillance networks, she empowers her audience to reclaim their digital sovereignty. In an era where information is often weaponized by those in power, Lisa Grant remains a steadfast advocate for the truth, ensuring that the principles of liberty and individual agency are not lost in the transition to an increasingly digital world.