In a decisive move to streamline disaster management, President Donald Trump has initiated a comprehensive restructuring of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). This initiative aims to bolster state and local governments’ roles in disaster preparedness and response, aligning with the administration’s commitment to efficient governance.
**Leadership Realignment**
The administration appointed David Richardson, a former Marine and Department of Homeland Security official, as the new head of FEMA. Richardson has expressed a firm approach to implementing changes, stating he will “run right over” staff who resist organizational reforms. He has suspended all delegated authority, centralizing decision-making to ensure alignment with presidential directives. This shift follows the dismissal of acting FEMA head Cameron Hamilton, who publicly opposed plans to limit or abolish the agency. Hamilton’s removal underscores the administration’s resolve to realign FEMA’s operations with its policy objectives.
**Policy Shifts and Program Terminations**
A significant policy change includes the termination of the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program. This program, designed to help communities prepare for natural disasters, was ended to eliminate “waste, fraud, and abuse.” Consequently, all applications from 2020 to 2023 have been canceled, and unused grant funds are being reclaimed. This decision reflects a broader strategy to reduce federal involvement in disaster preparedness, emphasizing state and local responsibilities.
**Executive Orders and State Empowerment**
President Trump signed an executive order transferring disaster preparation responsibilities from FEMA to state and local governments. The order emphasizes “common sense” investments by these entities to enhance national security against various risks, including wildfires, hurricanes, and cyber-attacks. While specific measures or funding sources are not detailed, the establishment of a “National Risk Register” aims to assess risks to national infrastructure and streamline federal-state collaborations.
**Financial Oversight and Accountability**
An audit by the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General uncovered mismanagement of approximately $10 billion in COVID-19 emergency grants by FEMA. Instances include a $1.1 billion grant supported by a single sheet of paper without itemized costs and overobligation of at least $1.5 billion for a state’s medical staffing grant. These findings have prompted calls for reform and improved oversight within the agency.
**Implications for Disaster Response**
The leadership changes and policy shifts have raised concerns among coastal states, particularly with the Atlantic hurricane season approaching. The sudden dismissal of FEMA’s acting head and the centralization of decision-making have led to uncertainty about the agency’s readiness. Additionally, the termination of key grant programs and the transfer of responsibilities to state and local governments have sparked debates about the adequacy of resources and preparedness at these levels.
**Conclusion**
The administration’s restructuring of FEMA represents a strategic effort to enhance efficiency and accountability in disaster management. While these changes aim to empower state and local governments, they also present challenges in terms of resource allocation and preparedness. As the new policies take effect, ongoing evaluation and potential adjustments may be necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the nation’s disaster response framework.
—
Deborah Cole reports on climate regulations, environmental mandates, and disaster response. She holds a degree in environmental studies from the University of Florida and worked in state-level emergency management before joining the press. Her reporting follows how policy meets practice across agencies, municipalities, and emergency zones.