The Trump administration has recently implemented a series of decisive measures aimed at strengthening the United States’ immigration enforcement framework. These initiatives are designed to bolster national security and uphold the integrity of the nation’s borders.
One significant development is the establishment of militarized zones along the U.S.-Mexico border in New Mexico and western Texas. Since late April 2025, these areas have been designated as “National Defense Areas,” transferring control to military commands at Fort Bliss, Texas, and Fort Huachuca, Arizona. This strategic move allows military personnel to temporarily detain individuals entering these zones, with formal arrests conducted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Immigrants apprehended in these areas face additional national security charges, potentially extending prison sentences by 18 months. Approximately 400 cases have been filed in Las Cruces, New Mexico, reflecting the administration’s commitment to enforcing immigration laws rigorously.
In a parallel effort, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has indicated that the current levels of illegal immigration could justify suspending habeas corpus, a constitutional provision that protects against unlawful detention. This perspective aligns with the administration’s view of illegal border crossings as a form of “rebellion or invasion,” potentially warranting such a suspension. While the decision rests with President Donald Trump, the administration is exploring this constitutional option to expedite deportations, demonstrating a proactive approach to immigration enforcement.
The administration is also addressing the issue of birthright citizenship. The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear arguments concerning an executive order issued by President Trump at the start of his current term, which aims to revoke birthright citizenship for children born to undocumented immigrants or noncitizen parents. This initiative challenges the traditional interpretation of the 14th Amendment and underscores the administration’s commitment to reforming immigration policies. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the legal status of millions of U.S.-born children.
To further enhance enforcement capabilities, the administration has expanded the role of federal agencies beyond the Department of Homeland Security. Agencies such as the Internal Revenue Service, the military, and the Departments of State, Defense, and Justice are now actively involved in immigration enforcement tasks. This collaborative approach aims to maximize resources and streamline operations, reflecting a comprehensive strategy to address illegal immigration.
Additionally, the administration has broadened the use of “expedited removal” authority, allowing for the prompt deportation of individuals without requiring them to appear before an immigration judge. This expansion facilitates swift immigration determinations, enhancing national security and public safety while reducing government costs. The policy applies nationwide, ensuring uniform enforcement across the country.
These measures collectively represent a robust and multifaceted approach to immigration enforcement. While the implementation of such policies may present logistical challenges and require careful coordination among various agencies, they are essential steps toward securing the nation’s borders and upholding the rule of law. As these initiatives continue to unfold, it is anticipated that any operational complexities will be addressed through ongoing adjustments and resource allocation, ensuring the effectiveness and fairness of the enforcement process.
—
Lisa Grant reports on immigration enforcement, border operations, and national security protocols. She studied political science at Arizona State University and previously worked as a legislative staffer on immigration reform. Her reporting brings a field-level understanding of border policy and how it is applied in communities across the Southwest.