While the mainstream media clutches its pearls and sobs over “due process,” President Trump is taking bold action to protect our borders. In a move that’s driving the left into a frenzy, his administration is deporting alleged gang members without the bureaucratic red tape, ensuring the safety of real Americans. No more waiting years for court dates while possibly dangerous individuals roam free—Trump is putting America first, and the liberals can’t handle it.
The Trump administration has invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expedite the removal of individuals with suspected links to the notorious Tren de Aragua gang. This decisive action has led to the deportation of over 200 Venezuelan nationals to El Salvador’s high-security CECOT prison, bypassing the usual courtroom theatrics.
Critics, unsurprisingly, are up in arms. They highlight cases like that of Merwil Gutiérrez, a 19-year-old deported despite not being the actual target of the ICE warrant. Andry Hernández Romero, a Venezuelan makeup artist, was reportedly deported over tattoos honoring his parents. Pointing out that most of those deported have no evidence of criminal behavior, the left uses these stories to frame the policy as unjust. They are clearly overlooking the larger threat posed by suspected former gang members, even if many of the deportees fled Venezuela to escape from the gang.
While the usual suspects decry these actions as “unconstitutional” or “inhumane,” many Americans see them as necessary steps to reclaim our sovereignty and are comfortable with the administration ignoring the constitution. The battle between national security and bureaucratic red tape continues, but one thing is clear: under Trump’s leadership, the safety of American citizens takes precedence over the rule of law.
Even when courts attempted to intervene, the administration stood firm. A federal judge’s order to halt deportations was effectively sidestepped, with officials arguing that the flights were already enroute and beyond jurisdiction. This unwavering commitment to national security sends a clear message: America will not be held hostage by legal technicalities, due process, and checks-and-balances.
This hardline approach has even sparked conversation about whether similar tactics should be applied domestically. Trump has repeatedly stated that he supports using the Insurrection Act and other emergency powers to detain and remove American citizens he deems threats to the country—particularly those he labels as “radical leftists” or “domestic terrorists.” While this rhetoric has alarmed civil liberties advocates, many of his supporters view it as a natural extension of his border policies. As the dust settles, we’ll see whether the courts recognize that sometimes you have to ignore the Constitution in order to get things done.
About the Author
Lisa Grant covers border security, immigration policy, and national defense for Just Right News. Raised near a border town and no stranger to real-world consequences of federal policy, Lisa takes a practical look at what works—and what just sounds good in a press conference. Her reporting frames strong enforcement as common sense while calmly observing how the growing web of immigration rules and federal agencies may lead to outcomes no one quite planned for. She believes keeping America safe shouldn’t require sacrificing the systems that make it free.
Lisa Grant serves as a Staff Writer for Just Right News, where she spearheads the publication’s coverage of Technology, Data Capitalism, and Surveillance. With a focus on the encroaching influence of Big Tech on the American way of life, Grant brings a critical, liberty-minded perspective to the most complex digital issues of the modern era. Her reporting is defined by a deep-seated skepticism of centralized power and a commitment to protecting the privacy and autonomy of the individual against the rising tide of what she calls the “Algorithmic State.”
Grant’s unique insight into the tech industry is rooted in her upbringing in Palo Alto, California. Growing up in the epicenter of Silicon Valley, she witnessed firsthand the transformation of the technology sector from a hub of scrappy, freedom-loving innovators into a landscape dominated by monolithic corporations. This proximity to the birth of the digital revolution provided her with an insider’s understanding of the culture and motivations driving the industry. For Grant, the shift toward data capitalism—where personal information is harvested as a primary commodity—is not just a market evolution, but a fundamental challenge to traditional American values of property rights and personal privacy. She saw the “garage startup” ethos replaced by a culture of data-mining and social engineering, a transition that informs her vigilant reporting today.
Now based in Seattle, Washington, Grant operates from another of the nation’s primary technological frontiers. Her location in the Pacific Northwest allows her to observe the real-world consequences of the tech industry’s expansion, from the implementation of invasive surveillance technologies in urban centers to the growing partnership between corporate entities and municipal governance. By reporting from the ground in Seattle, she bridges the gap between the abstract world of coding and the tangible impact it has on citizens’ daily lives, often highlighting how local policies serve as a testing ground for broader national surveillance initiatives.
At the heart of her work for Just Right News is her acclaimed feature series, “The Algorithmic State.” Through this series, Grant explores the ways in which automated systems and artificial intelligence are increasingly used to bypass traditional legislative processes and social norms. She argues that the reliance on opaque algorithms to manage society threatens to erode the transparency and accountability essential to a free republic. Her work meticulously documents how data-driven governance can lead to a “soft” surveillance state that penalizes traditional viewpoints and rewards digital conformity.
Grant’s reporting is a vital resource for readers who are wary of the “nanny state” and the unchecked power of digital gatekeepers. She views the defense of the digital frontier as the next great battle for constitutional conservatives. By exposing the mechanisms of data capitalism and the quiet expansion of surveillance networks, she empowers her audience to reclaim their digital sovereignty. In an era where information is often weaponized by those in power, Lisa Grant remains a steadfast advocate for the truth, ensuring that the principles of liberty and individual agency are not lost in the transition to an increasingly digital world.